Republic of New England



The English have been living in New England for 400 years. They gave the region its name - New England.

While non-English immigrants have changed the ethnic composition of New England, some parts of the region remain overwhelmingly English:





In order to create a free and independent Republic of New England, we call on all English Americans to join in the formation of a representative constitutional Republic of New England, representing government of the English people, by the English people and for the English people.

We stand for preserving the English people from biological and cultural extinction.

The founding fathers of the United States would be far closer to being English secessionists than to any of the other political groups of today.
The men who drafted the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution were all English. They shared a common ethnocultural background, and none of them wanted racial mixing.

In order to accomplish these goals, all ties relating to the domination of New England by the multicult regime in Washington should be abandoned, as soon possible and forever.

It is absolutely essential to the cause of freedom, prosperity and individual liberty of the English people in America.
.

A country just for English Americans!

Immigration Act of 1924 - Defending English Americans

The Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, Asian Exclusion Act (43 Statutes-at-Large 153), was a United States federal law that limited the number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country who were already living in the United States in 1890, down from the 3% cap set by the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, according to the Census of 1890.

English Americans were still the majority of the population and they wanted the country to remain ethnically English.

The law gave preference to immigrants from Britain.

It was aimed at further restricting Italians and Jews who were immigrating in large numbers starting in the 1890s, as well as prohibiting the immigration of Asians.

Congressman Albert Johnson was the chief author of the Immigration Act of 1924, which in 1927 he justified as a bulwark against "a stream of alien blood, with all its inherited misconceptions respecting the relationships of the governing power to the governed."

The National Origins Quota of 1924, according to the Immigration Act, was the first permanent limitation on immigration into the United States and established the “national origins quota system.” In conjunction with the Immigration Act of 1917, it governed American immigration policy until 1952 (see the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952).

It contained two quota provisions:

1. Effective until June 30, 1927—set the annual quota of any quota nationality at two percent of the number of foreign-born persons of such nationality resident in the continental United States in 1890 (total quota - 164,667).

2. From July 1, 1927 (later postponed to July 1, 1929) to December 31, 1952—used the national origins quota system: the annual quota for any country or nationality had the same relation to 150,000 as the number of inhabitants in the continental United States in 1920 having that national origin had to the total number of inhabitants in the continental United States in 1920.



The Congressional Record reports Representative William N. Vaile of Colorado, one of the most prominent restrictionists:

“What we do claim is that the northern European and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But… [t]hey came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it.

“We are determined that they shall not...It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves.” [Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922]

In 1790, the English made up about 60% of the total US population, more than 70% of the European American population. The overwhelming majority of the Founding Fathers of the United States were English, including Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson.

In 2009, according to American Community Survey data, Americans reporting English ancestry made up only 9% of the total U.S. population, and are only the third largest European group in the US, after Germans and Irish Americans.

English Americans have lost their demographic dominance in the US.

Why?

There are two important reasons:

1.
Nineteenth-century American intellectuals thought that immigrants to America would literally be assimilated to the English "race" (as Ralph Waldo Emerson put it). They believed that the English people could remain English even after absorbing other races and ethnic groups. These liberal intellectuals thought that immigrants of all strains would become Anglo-Saxons, they even believed that blacks would become white with more education.

The basic problem was that these thinkers were Lamarckians - that is, they believed that people could inherit traits that their ancestors had acqired during their lifetimes.

In the hands of Anglo-Saxon assimilationists, Lamarckism was part of the optimistic spirit of elite 19th-century liberal intellectuals who envisioned a future America to be people just like themselves, no matter what their origins.

This assimilationism has utterly failed, and the influx of millions of non-English immigrants over the last 200 years has turned the English into a minority in America.

English Americans' promotion of their own displacement is the ultimate foolishness. After all, it is difficult to come up with an historical example of a nation with a solid ethnic majority (America was at least 60% English in the 19th century) that has voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural power. Such transformations are typically accomplished by military invasions, great battles, and untold suffering.

2.
The vast majority of English Americans are unaware of or do not value their own ethnic interests. This extreme individualism is a tragic mistake. Other ethnic groups are aware of English individualism, and see it as a sign of weakness. For instance, Horace Kallen, the Jewish philosopher of cultural pluralism, commented in 1915 on the effects of the individualism of English American intellectuals of the period: "The older America, whose voice and spirit were New England, has... gone beyond recall. Americans of British stock still are prevailingly the artists and thinkers of the land, but they work, each for himself, without common vision or ideals. They have no ethos any more. The older tradition has passed from a life into a memory."

A huge problem for the English is lack of confidence. Many groups have created political and educational associations to promote racial and ethnic consciousness and to enhance cultural awareness. Blacks have the NAACP and Jews have the ADL. On campuses nationwide, students have offices of minority affairs, etc.

If the English in America should remain unconscious of who they are as a people, they will almost certainly be victimized by the higher cohesion and consciousness of non-English ethnic groups whose ethnic identity, family ties, and cultural motivations are more powerful than theirs.

This is why English Americans need to study English history.

Simply stated, the study of English history strengthens our ethnic identity and pride, knowing that we are but a link on a mighty chain strengthened through many centuries.

The English, and in particular the young, would gain greater self-respect and self-confidence if they had a better appreciation and understanding of their unique culture and heritage.

The Solution to Our Problem


180 years of non-English immigration and various measures imposed by the federal government to subordinate English interests to those of non-English people had irrevocably transformed the "American people" so that it was increasingly difficult to characterize them as even a majority-English population.

As a consequence, English Americans should start to make traditional nationalist claims for secession and self-determination because the United States has become a threat to their survival.

The present situation is such that any hope of reversing America's de-Anglicization is no longer feasible. The sole option left to English Americans seeking to ensure their existence in North America is to break off a portion of the lands their ancestors possessed and establish an English homeland.

To this end I propose the migration of ethically aware English Americans to the states with the highest percentages of English Americans (Utah, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire and Idaho).

The English should try to secede the only remaining ethnically English parts of the US